Systems thinking looks at problems within larger systems. It focuses on the relationships between different elements. It avoids focusing just on single events.
Government often encounters problems that are intertwined. Traditional methods may miss hidden links between issues. Systems thinking helps policymakers see the bigger picture.
Systems thinking lets governments find the origins of issues. It means solutions are more effective. It also helps avoid unintended consequences.
Departments work together more using this approach. Barriers within government are broken down. This improves communication and coordination.
Better policy decisions are possible with systems thinking. Predictions about outcomes are easier. This leads to more sustainable government policies.
More administrations are implementing systems thinking. Governments innovate and adapt better with this approach. Complex issues are easier to solve.
Governments can be more responsive with systems thinking. It encourages learning from what has happened. It makes government policies more flexible.
It builds resilience into government policy. Problems can be stopped before they grow. Governments can use it to plan for the long term.
This approach encourages the use of feedback and evaluation. Real-world data inform policy updates. Improvement is continuous with systems thinking.
It fits into all policy phases. Systems thinking is helpful in every phase. This ensures that policies remain relevant and effective.
It encourages citizen participation. Community needs are clearer to governments. This leads to policies that are fair and inclusive.
It disrupts unhelpful routines. Mistakes are not repeated. Learning becomes central to government.
Stubborn issues are addressed. It encourages creative and flexible solutions. Governments can use it to address issues like climate change and public health.
Systems thinking brings together different perspectives. Diverse input is valued. This leads to better, more balanced government policies.
Applying systems thinking may require new skills and training. Governments help staff learn. Staff are ready for complex issues.
Systems thinking can help governments manage limited resources. Effective solutions are identified. Government spending is optimized.
Results are measured effectively. It supports measurable objectives. Results are more transparent.
Government becomes more transparent. Communication is open. Trust is strengthened.
Systems thinking boosts policy quality. Policy becomes more resilient and effective. It should be used throughout government.
an overview of thinking in systems and quick tips on how to recognize issues and apply solutions.
last month we had a really interesting ibspn seminar on applications of systemic thinking to behaviour change. using a systems lens to explore behavioural challenges in policy development can lead to impactful and holistic policy solutions.
posts about systems thinking written by lancingfarrell
this article explores the importance of systems thinking as a mindset for designing, developing, procuring and delivering products, services, programs and policies, and how to apply it to product management.
better decisions emerge when we think across systems - understanding how different policies influence health outcomes and economic vitality
decisions in one realm have ripple effects in others. public programs need to reflect that reality.
systems thinking very much has a role to play across all government priorities.
from complexity to capability: in this blog post, kristian hudson, yharc implementation specialist's recent podcast conversation with professor harvey maylor explores how embracing uncertainty and the interconnectedness of real-world systems – core tenets of complexity science – can revolutionise implementation science. we dive into practical applications and how to shift systems towards better outcomes.
this post forms one part of the policy analysis in 750 words series overview and connects to previous posts on complexity. the first 750 words tick along nicely, then there is a picture of a cat ha…
alyx slater from food standards agency reflects on why systems thinking is an essential component of policy design.
cross-industry support for a new systems thinking report will help the built environment sector to deliver joined-up approaches with better results for people, places and planet, says mott macdonald’s global cities lead and fellow, clare wildfire.
background there is increasing interest in using systems thinking to tackle ‘wicked’ policy problems in preventive health, but this can be challenging for policy-makers because the literature is amorphous and often highly theoretical. little is known about how best to support health policy-makers to gain skills in understanding and applying systems thinking for policy action. methods in-depth interviews were conducted with 18 policy-makers who are participating in an australian research collaboration that uses a systems approach. our aim was to explore factors that support policy-makers to use systems approaches, and to identify any impacts of systems thinking on policy thinking or action, including the pathways through which these impacts occurred. results all 18 policy-makers agreed that systems thinking has merit but some questioned its practical policy utility. a small minority were confused about what systems thinking is or which approaches were being used in the collaboration. the majority were engaged with systems thinking and this group identified concrete impacts on their work. they reported using systems-focused research, ideas, tools and resources in policy work that were contributing to the development of practical methodologies for policy design, scaling up, implementation and evaluation; and to new prevention narratives. importantly, systems thinking was helping some policy-makers to reconceptualise health problems and contexts, goals, potential policy solutions and methods. in short, they were changing how they think about preventive health. conclusion these results show that researchers and policy-makers can put systems thinking into action as part of a research collaboration, and that this can result in discernible impacts on policy processes. in this case, action-oriented collaboration and capacity development over a 5-year period facilitated mutual learning and practical application. this indicates that policy-makers can get substantial applied value from systems thinking when they are involved in extended co-production processes that target policy impact and are supported by responsive capacity strategies.
by catherine hobbs why does public policy go wrong? how can researchers who are systems thinkers begin to create the conditions in which those involved in public policy may flourish within their po…
systems thinking for better social policy: a case study in financial wellbeing
engineering expertise meets policymaking practice - explore raeng programmes like policy fellowships and system approaches in government that bring systems thinking to government challenges
explore the idea of systems thinking as a new model for government; a new way of doing, certainly, but also a new way of thinking and being.
new ideas for improving policy making cannot mask the shortfall in funding that many public services are facing.
worldwide there is increasing interest in both academic and government sectors to evaluate the different impacts of electronic government (e-government) systems. a number of predictive, cause-effect, linearly and functionally oriented models of evaluation have been proposed and applied. the focus of...
a systems thinking approach to public health policy development is essential as it ensures there has been a thorough investigation into the dynamic complexit...
| in praise of systems thinking: what are “systems thinking” and “system dynamics”?
in recent years, there has been a marked rise in the use of systems thinking approaches in uk policy making institutions, especially in environmental domains. to better understand practice
climate change is one of the most pressing challenges facing present and future generations, with far-reaching impacts on the environment, society and the economy. addressing this complex issue requires a holistic and collaborative approach that goes beyond traditional top-down governance models.
by catherine hobbs and gerald midgley systems leadership involves organisations, including governments, collaborating to address complex issues and achieve necessary systemic transformations. so, i…
join our online event to explore the basics of systems thinking and why it
systems thinking provides new ways of seeing the world, focusing attention on the relationship between elements in complex systems and the spaces inbetween. haynes study shows that many policy-makers valued systems thinking as a new way to approach ...
by pete barbrook-johnson, co-author of systems mapping: how to build and use causal models of systems.
“the covid-19 pandemic has shown what governments can do when faced with an existential threat……”
a systems thinking approach is essential for public health policy development, offering a framework to navigate the dynamic complexities inherent in public health issues. this methodology enables policymakers to comprehend the interconnections ...
nihr sphr phd student ke zhou discusses her phd research about how systems approaches can be used to help tackle complex public policy issues. in social welfare and public health, we often aim to address challenging policy problems across many issues, disciplines, and, most importantly, governance departments. to successfully tackle complex questions, a variety of […]
increased systems thinking capacity—that is, the capacity to consider systemic effects of policies and actions—is necessary for translating knowledge on sustainable development goals’ (sdgs) interactions into practice. various models and tools that seek to support more evidence-based policy-making have been developed with the purpose of exploring system effects across sdgs. however, these often lack integration of behavioral aspects and contextual factors that influence the decision-making process. we analyze three applications of a decision-support approach called sdg synergies, which aims at building capacity in systems thinking among decision-makers and implementing agencies. our objective is to explore how behavior and context influences whether and how knowledge is taken up and acted upon when making decisions. drawing on empirical material from mongolia, colombia, and sri lanka, we identify three sets of mechanisms that appear important for enabling more systemic thinking: system boundaries (time, scale, and space), rules of engagement (ownership, representation, and purpose), and biases (confirmation biases and participation biases). results highlight some key challenges for systemic thinking that merit further attention in future applications, including the importance of localizing sdgs and incorporating this knowledge to national-level assessments, an unwillingness of stakeholders to acknowledge trade-offs, the challenge of addressing transformational as opposed to incremental change, and striking a balance between the flexibility of the approach vis-à-vis scientific robustness.
context knowledge mobilisation (km) is a vital strategy in efforts to improve public health policy and practice. linear models describing knowledge transfer and translation have moved towards multi-directional and complexity-attuned approaches where knowledge is produced and becomes meaningful through social processes. there are calls for systems approaches to km but little guidance on how this can be operationalised. this paper describes the contribution that systems thinking can make to km and provides guidance about how to put it into action. methods we apply a model of systems thinking (which focuses on leveraging change in complex systems) to eight km practices empirically identified by others. we describe how these models interact and draw out some key learnings for applying systems thinking practically to km in public health policy and practice. examples of empirical studies, tools and targeted strategies are provided. findings systems thinking can enhance and fundamentally transform km. it upholds a pluralistic view of knowledge as informed by multiple parts of the system and reconstituted through use. mobilisation is conceived as a situated, non-prescriptive and potentially destabilising practice, no longer conceptualised as a discrete piece of work within wider efforts to strengthen public health but as integral to and in continual dialogue with those efforts. a systems approach to km relies on contextual understanding, collaborative practices, addressing power imbalances and adaptive learning that responds to changing interactions between mobilisation activities and context. conclusion systems thinking offers valuable perspectives, tools and strategies to better understand complex problems in their settings and for strengthening km practice. we make four suggestions for further developing empirical evidence and debate about how systems thinking can enhance our capacity to mobilise knowledge for solving complex problems – (1) be specific about what is meant by ‘systems thinking’, (2) describe counterfactual km scenarios so the added value of systems thinking is clearer, (3) widen conceptualisations of impact when evaluating km, and (4) use methods that can track how and where knowledge is mobilised in complex systems.
by catherine hobbs and gerald midgley. originally published on the integration and implementation in